<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Water Cooler &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts and clippings from our travels in the digital arena</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Device Popularity Surges</title>
		<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2010/02/mobile-device-popularity-surges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2010/02/mobile-device-popularity-surges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popularity of smartphones, 3G devices and other advanced mobile applications surged in the US during 2009, according to comScore mobiLens data. Between December 2008 and December 2009, the percentage of US mobile phone subscribers with unlimited data plans increased from 16% to 21%, with several phones now requiring an unlimited data plan subscription at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2Fmobile-device-popularity-surges%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2Fmobile-device-popularity-surges%2F&amp;source=screenpilot&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The popularity of smartphones, 3G devices and other advanced mobile applications surged in the US during 2009, according to comScore mobiLens data.</p>
<p>Between December 2008 and December 2009, the percentage of US mobile phone subscribers with unlimited data plans increased from 16% to 21%, with several phones now requiring an unlimited data plan subscription at the time of purchase. During the same period, smartphone ownership increased from 11% to 17%, while 3G phone ownership increased from 32% to 43%. (via MarketingCharts).</p>
<p><strong>Smartphone Penetration Rises in 2009</strong></p>
<p>Smartphone penetration continued to climb in 2009 as consumers were presented with a growing number of smartphone handset options. Among the high-profile smartphone introductions in 2009 were the Palm Pre, Motorola Droid, Motorola Cliq and others.</p>
<p>In December 2009, smartphones were owned by 17% of US mobile phone subscribers, up nearly six percentage points from December 2008. Among smartphone operating system (OS) platforms, RIM retained its lead with 41.6% market share, followed by Apple at 25.3% (up 8.5 percentage points from the previous year) and Microsoft at 17.9%. Google’s OS share (5.2%) gained considerably in the final months of 2009 and is poised for continued growth in 2010 with the introduction of new devices featuring the Android platform.</p>
<p>Verizon Tops Among U.S. Mobile Network Providers</p>
<p>The largest four mobile network providers, Verizon, AT&amp;T, Sprint and T-Mobile, combined to account for 80% of the entire US mobile subscriber market in December 2009. Verizon led as the largest service provider in the US with a market share of 31.2% in December, followed by AT&amp;T with 25% share. Sprint and T-Mobile each captured 12.1% of the market.</p>
<p><strong>Motorola Continues to Lead OEM Market in 2009</strong></p>
<p>Motorola led the OEM (original equipment manufacturer) market in December 2009 with 23.5% of devices owned by mobile subscribers. While many of these handsets are legacy devices, Motorola has also made a more recent splash in the market with the introduction of the Droid and the Cliq. LG captured the second largest share of the handset market with 21.9%, up two percentage points from the previous year, followed closely by Samsung with 21.2%, up 2.7 percentage points. Apple captured 4.3% of the OEM market, up from just 1.9% share in December 2008, as the iPhone continued to gain traction last year.</p>
<p><strong>Symbian Leads Global Smartphone OS Vendors</strong></p>
<p>Symbian was the most popular smartphone OS by shipment volume in 2009, according to findings from technology market research firm Canalys. Although Symbian’s share of the global smartphone market dropped from 52.4% in 2008 to 47.2% in 2009, Symbian’s shipment volume grew 4.8%, from 74.9 million units to 78.5 million units.</p>
<p>Other findings on smartphone OS 2009 shipment volume from Canalys include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Although the Google Android OS only shipped 7.8 million units in 2009, this represented 1073.5% growth from 663,500 units in 2008. Global market share grew from 0.5% to 4.7%.</li>
<li>Microsoft, the third-most popular smartphone OS by global shipment volume in 2008, lost 26.4% of its volume in 2009, dropping from 19.9 million units to 14.7 million units. Market share declined from 13.9% to 8.8%, and Microsoft slipped to fourth place in smartphone global shipment volume.</li>
<li>Apple, the fourth-most popular smartphone OS by global shipment volume in 2008, traded places with Microsoft to become third-most-popular in 2009. Apple OS shipped 25.1 million units globally last year, up 82.9% from 13.7 million units in 2008. Market share grew from 9.6% to 15.1%.</li>
</ul>
<p>About the Survey: Data is taken from the comScore 2009 Digital US Year in Review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2010/02/mobile-device-popularity-surges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Want Brands that Inform</title>
		<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/10/americans-want-brands-that-inform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/10/americans-want-brands-that-inform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But don’t get too friendly! src: www.eMarketer.com The top characteristic US consumers want from brands they like is to improve their knowledge—and the least desirable one is for a brand to “only be visible in store”—according to the “Global Web Index” from Lightspeed Research. Helping consumers keep up to date on topics that were important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2Famericans-want-brands-that-inform%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2Famericans-want-brands-that-inform%2F&amp;source=screenpilot&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span><span id="lblBlurb">But don’t get too friendly</span></span>! src: <a title="eMarketer.com" href="http://www.eMarketer.com" target="_blank">www.eMarketer.com</a></p>
<p><span><span id="lblBody">The top characteristic US consumers want from brands they like is to improve their knowledge—and the least desirable one is for a brand to “only be visible in store”—according to the “Global Web Index” from <a href="http://www.globalwebindex.net/" target="_blank">Lightspeed Research</a>.</span></span></p>
<p>Helping consumers keep up to date on topics that were important to them was also key, followed by being entertaining, becoming part of a daily routine, and informing consumers about the product and the company. Consumers were relatively uninterested in brands that tried to act like their friends.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/107001-108000/107750.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Unsurprisingly in a difficult economy, consumers said the most relevant thing a brand could do for them was offer discounts. That topped various social and creative efforts such as online communities and brand-created video or TV programs.</p>
<p>Word-of-mouth was the No. 1 purchase driver according to the surveyed consumers. Face-to-face recommendations had significantly more weight with respondents than TV ads, advice from online friends, e-mails or Websites.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/107001-108000/107766.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>And the most trusted source of brand information was family members, followed by friends and experts.</p>
<p>Interestingly, US consumers found social network contacts and bloggers that they read regularly more trustworthy than major journalists, television news readers and radio presenters. Celebrities and TV show presenters were tied with politicians for the dishonor of being considered least trustworthy.</p>
<p>Compared with Americans, consumers surveyed in the UK were more likely to value brands that helped them connect with people, and were more responsive to competitions and TV advertising.</p>
<p><em>Keep up on the latest digital trends. Learn more about an eMarketer <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Products/Subscriptions.aspx" target="_blank">Total Access</a> subscription, today.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/10/americans-want-brands-that-inform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google eases trademark restrictions on some U.S. ads</title>
		<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/05/356/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/05/356/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenpilot.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) &#8211; Google Inc is lifting restrictions on the use of trademarked terms in its U.S. online advertising system, a move that could increase friction between the Internet giant and brand owners. The new policy will allow businesses to place trademarked terms directly in the copy of text advertisements that run in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F05%2F356%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F05%2F356%2F&amp;source=screenpilot&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';"> </span></p>
<div style="width:auto;font-family:Georgia,serif;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:100%;line-height:normal;text-align:left;border-width:0;margin:0;padding:3px;">
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:arial;font-size:13px;line-height:15px;"></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) &#8211; Google Inc is lifting restrictions on the use of trademarked terms in its U.S. online advertising system, a move that could increase friction between the Internet giant and brand owners.<span id="midArticle_byline"> </span></p>
<p><span id="midArticle_0"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">The new policy will allow businesses to place trademarked terms directly in the copy of text advertisements that run in the U.S. starting next month, the company announced in a blog post on Thursday.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_1"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">The move, which Google said will improve the quality of its advertisements, comes as advertisers have begun bidding less money for the individual search terms that their ads appear alongside and as Google&#8217;s revenue growth slows in the dismal economic climate.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_2"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Until now, Google has forbidden companies from placing trademarked terms in their advertising copy unless they owned the trademark or had explicit permission from the trademark owners.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_3"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">That policy was the equivalent of a supermarket promotion in a Sunday newspaper that only listed generic products like &#8220;discount cola&#8221; instead of the actual products for sale, Google said in its blog post on Thursday.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_4"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">The new policy will allow resellers and informational Web sites to use trademarked terms in their copy in certain situations without seeking permission from the trademark owners.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_5"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">The move represents the second recent loosening of Google&#8217;s policies on trademark use. Earlier this month, Google said it would allow companies in 190 countries outside the US to bid on trademarked keywords that act as the triggers for their own advertisements.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_6"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Google is also facing new legal challenges from trademark owners.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_7"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">On Monday, Firepond, a Texas software company, filed a trademark infringement suit against Google seeking class action status for all Texas trademark owners.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_8"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Brand owners have historically had serious concerns about Google&#8217;s policy with regards to trademarks, said Eric Goldman, Associate Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_9"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Google&#8217;s latest policy change is &#8220;kind of like pouring gasoline on the fire,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_10"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">The change may help consumers better understand sponsored search results, by allowing the advertiser to reference trademarks in their marketing pitches, Goldman said. But he predicted that the change could spark more legal challenges.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_11"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Google Senior Trademark Counsel Terri Chen acknowledged some people might be unhappy with the change, but she said she believed the ads would be well-received overall.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_12"> </span></p>
<p style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans;margin:0 0 1em;padding:0;">Chen said the policy was well-established legal principle in the US. Google is changing the policy now, she said, because it was more comfortable it had a process in place to monitor situations that don&#8217;t comply with the new policy.</p>
<p></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/05/356/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/04/355/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/04/355/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenpilot.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What CMOs Are Saying: Part III - Marketing dollars get tight, but don’t disappear. (eMarketer.com) A number of reports, and many media articles, say the sky is falling on marketers—and ad dollars are evaporating. The annual “Marketing Outlook” study, from the CMO Council, doesn’t agree. Following What Are CMOs Thinking? and More About What CMOs Are Thinking, this, a third survey of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F04%2F355%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F04%2F355%2F&amp;source=screenpilot&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:Verdana;font-size:12px;line-height:17px;"><span class="print_head" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:32px;font-weight:bold;"><span id="lblTitle"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">What CMOs Are Saying: Part III</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:Verdana;font-weight:normal;line-height:17px;">- </span></span></span></span><span class="print_subhead" style="line-height:26px;font-weight:bold;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span id="lblBlurb"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">Marketing dollars get tight, but don’t disappear.</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"> <br /></span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;line-height:32px;">(eMarketer.com)</span><br /></span></span><span class="print_text" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:16px;line-height:22px;"><span id="lblBody">
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">A number of reports, and many media articles, say the sky is falling on marketers—and ad dollars are evaporating.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">The annual “Marketing Outlook” study, from the </span></span><a href="http://www.cmocouncil.org/" target="blank" style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">CMO Council</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">, doesn’t agree.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">Following </span></span><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006971" target="blank" style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">What Are CMOs Thinking?</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"> and </span></span><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006992" target="blank" style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">More About What CMOs Are Thinking</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">, this, a third survey of CMOs, found that, despite the economy, marketers see budgets holding up fairly well and tightly controlled dollars going to growing and retaining market share.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">But isn’t that where marketing dollars </span></span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">always</span></span></i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"> go?</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">Yes, but as the report states: “Marketing, we are happy to report, is not running scared from the economy by slashing budgets and headcount. Instead, marketing is getting back to our key function: driving business and opportunity to sales and owning the customer experience.”</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">The pressure is on, however, for marketers to contribute to the bottom line. Management is demanding that marketers grow market share and improve operational efficiencies. Read: more accountability.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">That is probably why Website development and digital marketing topped the list of agency changes for 2009.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/102001-103000/102489.gif" /></span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">“Digital marketing has moved well beyond search as social media and experiential marketing continue to grow and evolve,” said Dave Couture of </span></span><a href="http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/section_node/0,1042,sid%253D26551,00.html" target="blank" style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">Deloitte Consulting LLP</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">, one of the sponsors of the report. “Savvy marketers are applying collaboration marketing methods as a central component of their efforts to maximize customer lifetime value in the digital economy.”</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">One-half of the global marketers surveyed claimed they were either holding firm on budgets or anticipating increases. Nearly one-third planned small budget increases, and 8% expected increases of more than 10%.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/102001-103000/102488.gif" /></span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">On the other hand, nearly one-half said they would decrease spending, with 19% expecting cuts of more than 15%.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-<br />
span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">In fact, when asked pointedly how economic conditions were influencing their budgets, 34% of the marketers said they were sharpening focus and reducing spending.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/102001-103000/102487.gif" /></span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">As noted above, however, not everyone shares the relatively rosy outlook of the marketers surveyed by the CMO Council.</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">In an article in Brandweek, Marc Babej of the marketing consultancy </span></span><a href="http://reason-inc.com/" target="blank" style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">Reason inc.</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);"> said, “Marketing budgets in many, if not most categories, are subject to cuts and in many cases they are deep cuts. That’s just the reality. Marketing positions are being cut too, absolutely.”</span></span></p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:17px;font-weight:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);">He believes that many marketers are simply “putting on a brave face.”</span></span></p>
<p></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/04/355/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/03/354/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/03/354/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenpilot.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Advertising Revenues Surpass $23 Billion in ’08, Reaching Record High Q4 &#8217;08 Revenues Total $6.1 Billion; Growth Continues Despite Difficult Economy NEW YORK, NY (March 30, 2009) – Internet advertising revenues in the U.S. remain strong, topping $23 billion, according to the 2008 Internet Advertising Revenue Report, released today by the Interactive Advertising Bureau [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F03%2F354%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenpilot.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F03%2F354%2F&amp;source=screenpilot&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';"><span class="AWC-18303" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:27px;color:rgb(68,68,68);letter-spacing:-1px;font-weight:normal;">Internet Advertising Revenues Surpass $23 Billion in ’08, Reaching Record High</span>
<p><span class="AWC-17780" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:16px;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-weight:bold;">Q4 &#8217;08 Revenues Total $6.1 Billion; Growth Continues Despite Difficult Economy</span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">NEW YORK, NY (March 30, 2009) – Internet advertising revenues in the U.S. remain strong, topping $23 billion, according to the 2008 Internet Advertising Revenue Report, released today by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). Despite a difficult U.S. economy, interactive advertising’s continued growth, albeit at a slower pace, confirms marketers&#8217; increased recognition of the medium’s value in reaching consumers online where they are spending more and more of their time.</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type:disc;">
<li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">Full-year 2008 revenues totaled a record $23.4 billion, exceeding 2007’s performance, itself the former record of $21.2 billion, by $2.2 billion or 10.6%. By comparison, a variety of sources indicate weakness in overall advertising spending. The Nielsen Company, for example, reported that U.S. advertising for the full year 2008 was down 2.6% compared to the full year 2007.</span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">Fourth-quarter revenues of $6.1 billion mark the first time the interactive advertising industry achieved, and surpassed, $6 billion in a single quarter. The figures represent a $154 million or 2.6% increase from 2007’s fourth quarter, which had revenues of $5.9 billion.</span></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:8px;"><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">This is the fifth consecutive year of record results.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">“We are seeing an ongoing secular shift from traditional to online media as marketers recognize that ad dollars invested in interactive media are effective at influencing consumers and delivering measurable results,” said Randall Rothenberg, president and CEO of the IAB. “In this uncertain economy, where marketers know they need to do more with less, interactive advertising provides the tools for them to build deep, engaging relationships with consumers—the experience marketers gain from this will deliver dividends especially after the economy turns around.”</span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">Search remains the main driver of revenue growth according to the report, showing a 19.8% increase over 2007. Digital video, though still a small overall contributor, more than doubled its revenue with an increase to $734 million from $324 million in 2007, demonstrating how both marketers and consumers are embracing this dynamic platform.</span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">As in 2007, retail, financial services, computing and automotive remained the four largest verticals among Internet advertisers in 2008. Consumer packaged goods, an industry vertical historically slow to embrace interactive advertising, notably increased its share of total Internet ad revenues by 60 percent over 2007. The Internet is now the third largest ad-supported medium, marking its increasing significance to marketers and consumers.</span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">“Though some categories in the fourth quarter slowed or even dipped, reflecting the current economic challenges, the overall performance is up, confirming interactive’s ever-growing importance to the successful marketing mix,” said David Silverman, Partner, Assurance, PricewaterhouseCoopers.</span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">The following chart highlights full-year revenue data breakouts; dollar figures are rounded.</span></p>
<table width="500" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" border="1" class="AWC-8482" style="border-collapse:collapse;font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><span class="AWC-17780" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:16px;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-weight:bold;">FY 2008<br />Share of revenue<br />$’s (000)</span><br /> </td>
<td><span class="AWC-17780" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:16px;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-weight:bold;">FY 2007<br />Share of revenue<br />$’s (000)</span><br /> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Search</strong></td>
<td><strong>45% ($10,546)</strong></td>
<td><strong>42% ($8,805)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Display Related:</strong></td>
<td><strong>33% ($7,640)</strong></td>
<td><strong>33% ($7,072)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>    -Banner Ads</td>
<td>21% ($4,877)</td>
<td>21% ($4,456)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>    -Rich Media</td>
<td>7% ($1,642)</td>
<td>8% ($1,656)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>    -Digital Video</td>
<td>3% ($734)</td>
<td>2% ($324)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>    -Sponsorship</td>
<td>2% ($387)</td>
<td>3% ($636)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Classifieds</strong></td>
<td><strong>14% ($3,174)</strong></td>
<td><strong>16% ($3,321)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Referrals/Lead Generation</strong></td>
<td><strong>7% ($1,683)</strong></td>
<td><strong>7% ($1,584)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>E-mail</strong></td>
<td><strong> 2% ($405)</strong></td>
<td><strong>2% ($424)</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">Conducted by the New Media Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Internet Advertising Revenue Report was launched in 1996 by the IAB, and aggregates data from all companies that report meaningful online advertising revenues. The results are considered the most accurate measurement of interactive advertising revenues with the data compiled directly from information supplied by companies selling advertising on the Internet. The survey includes data concerning online advertising revenues from Web sites, commercial online services, ad networks, free e-mail providers, and all other companies selling online advertising. First and third quarter revenue reports are estimates, with the actual figures being released along with second and fourth quarter data respectively. PwC does not audit t<br />
he information and provides no opinion or other form of assurance with respect to the information.<br /></span></p>
<p><span class="AWC-8482" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(68,68,68);text-transform:none;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;">A copy of the full report is available at: <a href="http://www.iab.net/insights_research/530422/adrevenuereport" style="color:rgb(220,41,30);text-decoration:none;">http://www.iab.net/AdRevenueReport</a></span></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenpilot.com/blog/2009/03/354/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
